Paff v. Galloway: Defining “Public Record” in the Digital Age

Brooke Lewis ’17 The New Jersey Supreme Court has recently decided to hear a case that will set open records policy in the emerging world of big data. While our government’s transition to the digital world has brought about new levels of speed and efficiency, it may have also created an unintended “black box.” Information … Continue reading Paff v. Galloway: Defining “Public Record” in the Digital Age

Revealing Algorithmic Rankers

By Julia Stoyanovich (Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Drexel University) and Ellen P. Goodman (Professor, Rutgers Law School).  This post is derived from their recent Freedom to Tinker post. ProPublica’s story on “machine bias” in an algorithm used for sentencing defendants amplified calls to make algorithms more transparent and accountable.  It has never been more … Continue reading Revealing Algorithmic Rankers

Why a ‘Large and Unjustified’ Payment Threshold is Not Consistent with Actavis

FTC v. Actavis was a landmark antitrust decision. In rejecting the “scope of the patent” test that had immunized settlements by which brand-name drug firms pay generic companies to delay entering the market (“exclusion payment settlements”), the Supreme Court made clear that such agreements “tend to have significant adverse effects on competition” and could violate … Continue reading Why a ‘Large and Unjustified’ Payment Threshold is Not Consistent with Actavis

The Big (Patent) Short

WINNER OF THE FIRST ANNUAL LASTOWKA SHORT-FORM WRITING COMPETITION IN INFORMATION LAW Carl J. Minniti III ‘17 You cannot manipulate the stock market on purpose. For example, in a classic “pump and dump” scheme, market manipulators use misleading tactics in order to inflate stock prices by convincing unwitting investors to buy. Then, once the stock price reaches … Continue reading The Big (Patent) Short