On behalf of 38 professors, Prof. Michael Carrier files amicus brief in Ninth Circuit

On behalf of 38 professors, Prof. Michael Carrier filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Epic v. Apple. The brief argued that the district court erred in applying the Rule of Reason by: (1) accepting business rationales that aren’t antitrust justifications; (2) failing in its legal conclusions … Continue reading On behalf of 38 professors, Prof. Michael Carrier files amicus brief in Ninth Circuit

Prof. Mike Carrier submits comments to DOJ/PTO/NIST

Prof. Mike Carrier submitted comments to the Department of Justice, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and National Institute of Standards and Technology on the Draft Policy Statement on Licensing Negotiations and Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject to Voluntary F/RAND Commitments. The comment supports the draft policy statement, explaining how it presents a welcome return to … Continue reading Prof. Mike Carrier submits comments to DOJ/PTO/NIST

Prof. Mike Carrier publishes article in Harvard Health Policy Review

Prof. Mike Carrier published “A Simple Solution to the Problem of ‘Product Hopping’” in the Harvard Health Policy Review. The piece explains why legislation addressing product hopping, in which brand-name drug companies switch from one version of a drug to another just to keep the generic off the market, is the best option to address … Continue reading Prof. Mike Carrier publishes article in Harvard Health Policy Review

Prof. Michael Carrier’s research cited in Supreme Court opinion

In NCAA v. Alston, the Supreme Court, in a 9-0 opinion written by Justice Gorsuch, ruled in favor of student-athletes and against the NCAA on the issue of whether the restriction of education-related benefits violated antitrust law. The Court’s opinion was consistent with several of the points Prof. Michael Carrier and Chris Sagers made in … Continue reading Prof. Michael Carrier’s research cited in Supreme Court opinion