Professor Hrdy Moderates Trademark Law Panel at Penn Law, Asking “Should Strong Marks Get Greater Protection”?

Professor Hrdy moderated a panel on trademark law at Penn Law on Friday. The panel, entitled, “How Far Should Trademark Protection Extend?” was hosted by the Penn Intellectual Property Group (PIPG) for their Annual Symposium, which took place on Friday, March 21, 2025, at University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School. The Panelists, pictured above, were: … Continue reading Professor Hrdy Moderates Trademark Law Panel at Penn Law, Asking “Should Strong Marks Get Greater Protection”?

OpenEvidence v. Pathway: The Legal Battle Over AI Reverse Engineering

  Can generative AI models like ChatGPT be “reverse engineered” in order to develop competing models? If so, will this activity be deemed legal reverse engineering or illegal trade secret misappropriation? I have now written a few articles exploring this question, including Trade Secrecy Meets Generative AI and Keeping ChatGPT a Trade Secret While Selling It Too. But when … Continue reading OpenEvidence v. Pathway: The Legal Battle Over AI Reverse Engineering

Profs. Perzanowski & Fagundes: A new framework for conceptualizing the end of IP rights

  This blog post is cross-posted on Written Description. Aaron Perzanowski and Dave Fagundes have just posted a very interesting and thought-provoking paper draft on SSRN called “How Intellectual Property Ends.”   The paper, which follows up on their prior work on copyright abandonment, closely examines how IP rights come to an end through doctrines like “expiration,” “forfeiture,” or “abandonment.” … Continue reading Profs. Perzanowski & Fagundes: A new framework for conceptualizing the end of IP rights